Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and Person Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The place out-of attachment from inside the people mating. Article on Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Websites contradiction revisited. Log from Public Situations, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A social technology that decrease personal wedding and you may psychological better-are? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.Meters., & Sphere, J. Meters. (2001). Count, time, and you may time of marriages and divorces. Latest People Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional analysis regarding closeness, appeal, and you may partnership: Analysis the new assumptions of triangular idea regarding love. Mental Accounts, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step three.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Feeling most readily useful regarding the performing tough: Public reviews in this intimate relationships. Log out of Character and you may Societal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. Good., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The latest implicit cognition regarding close rivalry. Journal off Personality and you can Public Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.

A good. (2001)mitment and you can relationships maintenance components

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention in order to attractive possibilities: Brand new changed psychology of relationships repairs. Advancement and you can People Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential studies away from dispute and you will agreement in disappointed and you may nondistressed relationship lovers. Journal out of Asking and you will Health-related Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A great., Eco-friendly, A great. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Dating development online: What is the large appeal? Record away from Personal Affairs, 58(1), 9–31.

The great benefits of confident illusions: Idealization additionally the framework from fulfillment during the romantic relationships

Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-comparison objectives from inside the close dating: A model of internationally improvement and you may particular verification. Within the P. Noller & J. An excellent. Feeney (Eds.), Information ents in the study of couples correspondence (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College Press.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the consumer-therapist bond from the lens regarding connection idea. Psychotherapy: Idea, Research, Habit, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & amerikansk ukrainsk pige hot Gardner, W. L. (2005). This new societal overseeing system: Improved awareness in order to public cues because a transformative a reaction to societal exclusion. In the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The newest public outcast: Ostracism, societal exemption, getting rejected, and you will intimidation (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Mindset Force.

Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the globe and certain relational models on exposure to public interactions. Log away from Personality and you will Social Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A great., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you will recommendations looking to from inside the romantic relationships. Identity and you will Public Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you can particular accessory representations from inside the adulthood: Is there a love?. Record Off Social And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. In J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic romantic matchmaking: Maintenance and you will improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A. D. (2000). Projection directly perception one of spouses while the a function of this new similarity within common knowledge. Identity And you may Societal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Negative effects of salience of extrinsic benefits for the preference and enjoying. Record from Identification and you can Societal Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.